Cppcheck is a static analysis tool for C/C++ code. It provides unique code analysis to detect bugs and focuses on detecting undefined behaviour and dangerous coding constructs. The goal is to detect only real errors in the code (i.e. have very few false positives).


Cppcheck 1.83

News: There is now MISRA compliance checking (MISRA C 2012) in Cppcheck.

Platform File
Windows 64-bit (No XP support) Installer
Windows 32-bit (No XP support) Installer
Source code (.zip)Archive
Source code (.tar.gz)Archive


Cppcheck can also be installed from various package managers; however, you might get an outdated version then.
sudo apt-get install cppcheck
sudo yum install cppcheck
brew install cppcheck


Unique code analysis that detect various kinds of bugs in your code.

Both command line interface and graphical user interface are available.

Cppcheck has a strong focus on detecting undefined behaviour.

Undefined behaviour


The most common types of security vulnerabilities in 2017 (CVE count) was:

Category     Amount     Detected by Cppcheck
Buffer Errors 2530 A few
Improper Access Control 1366 A few (unintended backdoors)
Information Leak 1426 A few (unintended backdoors)
Permissions, Privileges, and Access Control 1196 A few (unintended backdoors)
Input Validation 968 No

CVEs that was found using Cppcheck:

These CVEs are shown when you google "cppcheck CVE". Feel free to compare the search results with other static analysis tools.

Security experts recommend that static analysis is used. And using several tools is the best approach from a security perspective.

Coding standards

Cert: A few checkers availabe in addon.

Misra: Feature matrix.

All checks

For a list of all checks in Cppcheck see: http://sourceforge.net/p/cppcheck/wiki/ListOfChecks.

Clients and plugins

Cppcheck is integrated with many popular development tools. For instance:

Other static analysis tools

Using a battery of tools is better than using one tool. Each tool has unique code analysis and therefore we recommend that you also use other tools.

Cppcheck focus on bugs instead of stylistic issues. Therefore a tool that focus on stylistic issues could be a good addition.

Cppcheck tries very hard to avoid false positives. Sometimes people want to detect all bugs even if there will be many false warnings, for instance when they are working on a release and want to verify that there are no bugs. A tool that is much more noisy than Cppcheck might be a good addition.

Even tools that have the same design goals as Cppcheck will probably be good additions. Static analysis is such a big field, Cppcheck only covers a small fraction of it. No tool covers the whole field. The day when all manual testing will be obsolete because of some tool is very far away.


View all news…


You can read the manual or download some articles.



You are welcome to contribute. Help is needed.

Pick a project and test its source with the latest version of Cppcheck. Submit tickets to Trac about the issues you find in Cppcheck.
Pick a ticket from Trac, write a test case for it (and write a comment to the ticket for which that test case has been created). Alternatively, pick a test case that fails and try to fix it. Make a patch and submit it to Trac either inline, if it is small, or otherwise - attach it as a file.
Write articles, reviews or tell your friends about us. The more users we have, the more people we have testing and the better we can become.
Come up with some new good checks, and create tickets in the Trac instance about them.
Write a plugin for your favorite IDE or create a package for your distribution or operating system.
Technical Writing
Write better documentation for the bugs we find. Currently only a few bugs have any documentation at all.